Kontruksi Makna Muqsam Bih dalam QS al-Nāzi‘āt [79]:1–5 Perspektif Ibn ‘Āsyūr

Authors

  • Nurfadzilla Putri UIN Ar-Raniry
  • Misnawati Misnawati UIN Ar-Raniry

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37985/hq.v7i2.1035

Keywords:

Qasam, Muqsam Bih, QS. al-Nāzi‘āt

Abstract

Qasam is one of the most significant rhetorical devices in the Qur’an, functioning to emphasize messages, strengthen arguments, and shape the thematic orientation of a surah. In QS. al-Nāzi‘āt [79]:1–5, the sequence of oaths introduced by al-nāzi‘āt, al-nāsyiṭāt, al-sābiḥāt, al-sābiqāt, and al-mudabbirāt has generated diverse interpretations regarding the identity of the muqsam bih (object of oath). While some exegetes interpret these expressions as angels, others associate them with stars, archers, or other entities. This diversity raises questions about how the meaning of muqsam bih is constructed and how it relates to the theme of resurrection that dominates the surah. This study aims to analyze the construction of muqsam bih in QS. al-Nāzi‘āt [79]:1–5 according to Ibn ‘Āsyūr in Al-Taḥrīr wa al-Tanwīr. Employing a qualitative approach through library research, the study uses QS. al-Nāzi‘āt [79]:1–5 and Al-Taḥrīr wa al-Tanwīr as primary sources, supported by works on Qur’anic exegesis, rhetoric, and Qur’anic oaths. The data are examined through descriptive-analytical methods focusing on linguistic aspects, oath structures, and the relationship between muqsam bih and muqsam ‘alaih. The findings reveal that Ibn ‘Āsyūr considers these expressions as adjectival forms referring to an omitted mawṣūf, thereby allowing multiple interpretive possibilities. Nevertheless, he ultimately favors the interpretation of angels because it best corresponds to the surah’s context and its argument for resurrection. The study concludes that muqsam bih in QS. al-Nāzi‘āt [79]:1–5 functions not merely as an object of oath but as a rhetorical construction that reinforces the certainty of resurrection as the central theme of the surah.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Fatih, M. S., Madaniah, S. A., & Dasuki, A. Distingsi Corak Tafsir Al-Munir Karya Wahbah Al-Zuhaili Dan Al-Tahrir Wa Al-Tanwir Karya Muhammad Al-Thahir Ibn Asyur. At-Taklim : Jurnal Pendidikan Multidisiplin, 2(12), 482–496. (2025) Https://Journal.Hasbaedukasi.Co.Id/Index.Php/At-Taklim

Al-Qaṭṭān, Mannā’ Khalīl. Mabāḥith Fī ‘Ulūm Al-Qur’ān. 3rd Ed., Maktabah Al-Ma‘Ārif, 2000.

Al-Qaṭṭān, Mannā’ Khalīl. Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’an (Mabāḥith Fī ‘Ulūm Al-Qur’ān). Pustaka Litera Antarnusa, 2007.

Al-Qushayrī, Abū Al-Qāsim. Laṭā’if Al-Ishārāt. Vol. 1, Dār Al-Kutub Al-‘Ilmiyyah, 2000.

Al-Suyūṭī, Jalāl Al-Dīn. Al-Itqān Fī ‘Ulūm Al-Qur’ān. Tahqīq Muḥammad Abū Al-Faḍl Ibrāhīm, Vol. 2, Al-Hay’ah Al-Miṣriyyah Al-‘Āmmah Li Al-Kitāb, 1974.

Asfar, K. Metodologi Tafsir At-Tahrīr Wa At-Tanwīr Karya Muhammad Tahir Ibnu ’Asyur. Al Aqwam : Jurnal Studi Al-Quran Dan Tafsir, 1(1), 55–67. (2022). Https://Ejournal.Iaingorontalo.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Alaqwam

Al-Zarkashī, Badr Al-Dīn. Al-Burhān Fī ‘Ulūm Al-Qur’ān. Dār Iḥyā’ Al-Kutub Al-‘Arabiyyah, 1957.

Al-Ṭabarī, Muḥammad Ibn Jarīr. Jāmi‘ Al-Bayān ‘An Ta’wīl Āy Al-Qur’ān. Mu’assasah Al-Risālah, 2001.

Azka Fazaka Rif’ah, A. M., Sabri, M. S., & Ghany, A. Konstruksi Penafsiran Ayat-Ayat Qasam: Analisis Tafsir Bint Al-Syāṭi’ Pada QS.Al-Nāzi’āt/79:1-5. Qudwah Qur’aniyah: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir, 1(1), 45–60. (2023). Https://Doi.Org/10.30631/Qudwahquraniyah.V1i1.1846

Azis, Sidik Ismail Abdul. Pandangan Bintu Syathi Tentang Qasam (Studi Kitab Al-Tafsir Al-Bayani Lil Qur'an Al-Karim). Skripsi, Program Studi Ilmu Al-Qur'an Dan Tafsir, Fakultas Ushuluddin Dan Studi Agama, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung, 2018.

Hamzah Tacong. Aqsam Al-Qur’an: Fungsi Retoris Dan Teologis Sumpah Dalam Penguatan Hujjah Wahyu. IMTIYAZ: Jurnal Ilmu Keislaman, 9(3), 473–489. (2025). Https://Doi.Org/10.46773/Imtiyaz.V9i3.2341

Huda, N. Kaidah-Kaidah Al-Qasam Dalam Al-Qur’an. Jurnal Al-Fath, 10(1), (2016). Https://Jurnal.Uinbanten.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Alfath/Article/Download/3088/2246

Ibn Al-Qayyim Al-Jawziyyah. Al-Tibyān Fī Aqsām Al-Qur’ān. Dār Al-Ma‘Rifah, 1994.

Ibnu ’Asyur, M. Al-T. Tafsir Al-Tahrir Wa Al-Tanwir. Al-Dar Al Tunisiyyah Li Al-Nasyr. (1984).

Jannah, M. Epistemologi Tafsir Ibnu ‘Asyur Dalam Kitab Tafsir Al-Tahrir Wa Al-Tanwir. Moderasi : Journal Of Islamic Studies, 5(1), 332–346. (2025). Https://Doi.Org/10.54471/Moderasi.V5i1.120

Jansen, J. J. G. The Interpretation Of The Koran In Modern Egypt. E. J. Brill, 1980.

Musṭafā, Ibrāhīm. Al-Tafsīr Al-Adabī Li Al-Qur’ān Al-Karīm. Dār Nahḍah Miṣr, 2000.

Qutb, Sayyid. Fī Ẓilāl Al-Qur’ān. Dār Al-Shurūq, 2003.

Rif’ah, Azka Fazaka, Ahmad Murtadho, Muhammad Sabri, And Abdul Ghany. Konstruksi Penafsiran Ayat-Ayat Qasam: Analisis Tafsir Bint Al-Syāṭi’ Pada QS. Al-Nāzi’āt/79:1–5. Qudwah Qur’aniyah: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2023.

Shihab, M. Quraish. Mukjizat Al-Qur’an. Mizan, 2007.

Suryani, K. Keunggulan Bahasa Al-Qur’an Di Bidang Sastra (Al-Balaghah) Dalam Pandangan Ibn Asyur. Dar El-Ilmi : Jurnal Studi Keagamaan, Pendidikan Dan Humaniora, 6(2), 220–245. (2019). Https://Doi.Org/Https://Doi.Org/10.52166/Dar El-Ilmi.V6i2.1652

Downloads

Published

2026-10-02

How to Cite

Putri, N., & Misnawati, M. (2026). Kontruksi Makna Muqsam Bih dalam QS al-Nāzi‘āt [79]:1–5 Perspektif Ibn ‘Āsyūr. Hamalatul Qur’an : Jurnal Ilmu Ilmu Alqur’an, 7(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.37985/hq.v7i2.1035